SV: SV: Information and Natural Languages

Dear Koichiro

I find it difficult to answer your time considerations. But I agree with
you on the muddle of epistemology and ontology - but at the same time I
do not think they are independant. There seems to be ontological
prerequisites in most epistemological views.

Venlig hilsen/Best wishes

Assoc. Prof. Ph. D. S�ren Brier
Royal School of Library and Information Science, Aalborg Branch
Langagervej 4, DK-9220 Aalborg �st
Telephone: +45 98 157922 , Fax: +45 98 151042
Homepage: http://www.db.dk/dbaa/sbr/home_uk.htm
Ed. & Publisher of Cybernetics & Human Knowing
homepage: http://www.db.dk/dbaa/sbr/cyber.htm

> ----------
> Fra: koichiro matsuno/7129[SMTP:kmatsuno@vos.nagaokaut.ac.jp]
> Sendt: 12. december 1997 07:56
> Til: Multiple recipients of list
> Emne: Re: SV: Information and Natural Languages
>
>
>
> Soeren's
>
>
>
> >I guess that all observers are internal to the universe? Aren't they.
>
> >Laplaces demon is dead.
>
>
>
> is right. Agreed.
>
>
>
> >One of the questions is if we will ever be able to form a consisten
>
> >theory of the development of life and consciousness and thereby
>
> >consistent with our own epistemology in this ontology. I seriously
>
> >doubt it.
>
>
>
> How about the possibility of the job division; the present
>
> progressive tense for ontology and the present tense for
>
> epistemology? My prejudice is that Heidegger may be in favor of
>
> such a job division.
>
>
>
> >But so far the scientific world view has stopped there, mainly
>
> >because of physicalism.
>
>
>
> Because of an undisciplined muddling of both ontology
>
> and epistemology, too(?)
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Koichiro
>
>
>
> Koichiro Matsuno
>
Received on Fri Dec 12 13:29:37 1997