Re: neuro: and what else

Dear Bela and colleagues,

your comments on the relationships between the info phyla are quite
interesting (and your very positive views are much appreciated too). I
agree that, in its more general form, this is a discussion that we should
continue as it seems to give room to new analytical paths. In the past
year, we also left interrumpted the discussion about Igor & Abir's 13
points. Maybe in a next discussion round we could come back to both topics,
that in my opinion are very closely interrelated.

However, in this sort of overall info schemes there is a danger, as we can
produce endless big categorizations on info phenomena without any practical
value. Obviously the challenge is the articulation of such categories in
ways that stimulate new scientific views. Couldn't we try to reconnect the
general info phyla theme with the concrete neuro discussion started by
Peter?

best

Pedro

------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuan. TEL 34 976 761 927, FAX 34 976 762 111
BIOINFORMATION GROUP. Dept. Ingen. Electronica y Comunicaciones,
CPS Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza 50015, SPAIN
email: marijuan@posta.unizar.es
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu May 04 13:57:37 2000