Re: What about disinformation?

From: John Collier <[email protected]>
Date: Fri 22 Feb 2002 - 15:41:35 CET
At 02:30 PM 22/02/02, you wrote:
Diffused by Complexity Digest 2002.08 February-21-2002

The Pentagon is developing plans to provide news items, possibly even false ones, to foreign media organizations as part of a new effort to influence public sentiment and policy makers in both friendly and unfriendly countries, military officials said.

The plans, which have not received final approval from the Bush administration, have stirred opposition among some Pentagon officials who say they might undermine the credibility of information that is openly distributed by the Defense Department's public affairs officers.

<http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/19/international/19PENT.html>Pentagon Readies Efforts to Sway Sentiment Abroad, NYTimes, 02/02/18

Editor's Note: Disinformation has been a traditional element of warfare with often unexpected outcomes as a result of the interactions of hostile audiences (those who always claim that the released information is false) and the friendly audiences (those who want to believe that the released information is true). Simulations to estimate the effect of any piece of released (dis)information onto a multi-cultural audience certainly have a high degree of complexity.

Disinformation is certainly a special case, since it does carry information. Luciano Floridi has been investigating misinformation, which is like information only it is not true. He has a draft chapter that discusses this issue among others. Here is his email message, which I don't think has been posted here>

Apologise for cross-posting
Dear colleague,
the draft 1.0 of "Information", chapter 5 of the Blackwell Guide to the
Philosophy of Computing and Information (Oxford - NY: Blackwell, 20003)
http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~floridi/blackwell/index.htm is available for
comments at
http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~floridi/pdf/info.pdf
I shall be very grateful and fully acknowledge any critical comment you may
wish to share.
Best regards,
Luciano Floridi
_______________________________________
[email protected]
www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~floridi/


I think that the whole issue of false messages requires careful study. Since falsity is a semantic notion, the idea applies only to semantic, not syntactic information and it correlates. Intentions also come into play.

Incidentally, my spell checker wants to replace "disinformation" with "disinfestation".

John



Dr John Collier                   [email protected]
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research
Adolf Lorenz Gasse 2
A-3422 Altenberg Austria
http://www.newcastle.edu.au/department/pl/Staff/JohnCollier/ Received on Fri Feb 22 15:38:34 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 07 Mar 2005 - 10:24:45 CET