Re: info & physics

From: Rafael Capurro <[email protected]>
Date: Mon 20 May 2002 - 16:01:22 CEST

Karl,

what we are discussing now (concerning
the physical/biological/psychical...) status
of information are less theological and
more ontological or metaphysical questions.
The question of being underlies this
discussion, for better for worse.
Of course it is possible to say: everything
that is, is information (as we can say:
everything that is, is matter or whatever).
This can be understood in several ways:
1) things (or: what is) are information (similar
to Pythagoras: things are numbers)
2) there are some things that are informational
(particularly: that exist as 'digital' information)
3) we can look at things (including nature)
from the point of view of information (i.e. of
informational processes) but this does not
imply that they are only information.
The first thesis is a metaphysical one, the
second should be considered within a broader
ontology, the third implies that we may
project reality within the horizon of information
abut also within the horizon of matter etc.
If we understand by information a process
of selection out of a message (which is indeed
also the terminology used by Shannon) then
we can say that we are already involved in a
natural information process (the theological
question being then how it is possible to
send a message to 'nothing' i.e. a message
that 'creates' and not simply 'informs' the
receiver...). Of course the concept of message
(implying a sender, a receiver, a structure to
be 'interpreted'/selected and... an address!)
is basic. The complexity of human messages
is indeed of different kind (but not simply
opposed or even contradictory...) to the complexity
of, say, a DNA-messenger or of a quantum state.
What I am trying to say is that the (modern)
paradigm of message communication (underlying
in different ways the concept(s) of information)
is (seems to me) basic for our scientific view
of nature and society and... it seems to be
highly productive too, independently of the
ontological/metaphysical (and theological)
discussion...

Is this somehow acceptable for further discussion?

Rafael

Prof. Dr. Rafael Capurro, FH Stuttgart, Hochschule der Medien (HdM)
University of Applied Sciences, Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
E-Mail: capurro@hdm-stuttgart.de; rafael@capurro.de
Tel. : +49 - 711 - 25 706 - 182
Universit�t Stuttgart, Institut f�r Philosophie, Dillmannstr. 15, 70049 Stuttgart, Germany
Private: Redtenbacherstr. 9, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany. Tel.: +49 - 721 - 98 22 9 -22 (fax: -21)
Homepage in German/English/Spanish/French: www.capurro.de
ICIE (International Center for Information Ethics): http://icie.zkm.de
Received on Mon May 20 16:02:36 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 07 Mar 2005 - 10:24:45 CET