Re: Data and meaning (3)

Pedro,
It is an interesting suggestion to ask if the MGS can be realistic
for the prokaryotic cellular signaling system applied to
cellular locomotion.
I do not really know this subject. Just give some time to look
in it and I will come back to you.

Regards

Christophe

>
> Cristophe --thanks for your new points. At the time being I cannot
> neither
> disagree nor agree. In my own terms, understanding the 'proteome-genome'
>
> (or perhaps better, 'transcriptome') interrelationship through one of
> your
> Meaning Generator Systems might be useful to ascend towards the
> computational description of further levels of complexity (tissues,
> organs,
> systems, organisms). But the proof of the pudding is in the tasting:
> although the whole cellular complexity is intractable, could you
> envision a
> realistic MGS model (in molecular terms), for instance, of the
> prokaryotic
> cellular signaling system (the well-known 'two component system')
> applied
> to cellular locomotion? This system is now a fashion in alife and
> autonoumous robotics. There is plenty of data and you could more or less
>
> easily submit to the 'molecular test' your MGS computational approach...
> If
> you consider interesting the suggestion, I would be happy to
> collaborate.
>
> best wishes
>
>Pedro
Received on Thu Oct 10 20:12:03 2002