[Fis] Music appears as being unavoidably subjective

What 'information' did Beethoven intend to transfer when he
structured his 'Choral' symphony for being culminated by the words
about Joy written Schiller?

Did the musical sounds improve or did they deteriorate the
information carried out by the words 'inserted' in the Gregorian
chants?

What have in common -apart of being verbal, and consequently audible-
the information transferred by Edith Piaf, Agust�n Lara, Fernandel,
the Beatles and Perez Prado when singing (words and music) 'La Vie en
Rose', 'Estoy pensando en ti', 'On n'est jamais tout seul',
'Yesterday' and Mambo?

Shouldn't the musicians encourage themselves to transfer information
by means of quarters of tone - the so-called sound 13 by Julian
Carrillo - in order to develop the hearing acuity?

Many useful possibilities seem to offer the recognition of Music as a
tool subjectively structured by musicians (composers) and
subjectively employed by musicians (interpreters) for the transfer of
information that very often intends to increase the individual
gregariousness, though in some cases it is perversely used for
manipulation of minds.

These possibilities cannot emerge when the features of music are
simplified and fragmented after being disregarded and even ignored
that musical sounds are appreciated differently, therefore
peculiarly, by every human. Today research on causality of music as a
tool exclusively human might lead in searching how to develop musical
possibilities for helping to humans to recognize how to solve
conflicts through conditioned agreements
Received on Wed Jun 4 01:22:21 2003