Dear Michel,
The relation between thermodynamic entropy and the information is
provided by the Szilard-Brillouin relation as follows:
Delta S >= k(B) Delta H
(W. Ebeling. Chaos, Ordnung und Information. Frankfurt a.M.: Harri
Deutsch Thun, 1991, at p. 60.)
k(B) in this formula is the Boltzmann constant. Thus, a physical change
of the system can provide an information, but it does not have to.
Unlike the thermodynamic entropy, probabilistic entropy has no
dimensionality (because it is mathematically defined). The Boltmann
constant takes care of the correction in the dimensionality in the
equation.
When applied as a statistics to other systems (e.g., biological ones)
one obtains another (specific) theory of communication in which one can
perhaps find another relation between the (in this case biological)
information and the probabilistic entropy. This can be elaborated for
each specific domain.
With kind regards,
Loet
_____
Loet Leydesdorff
Science & Technology Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam
Tel.: +31-20-525 6598; fax: +31-20-525 3681
<mailto:loet@leydesdorff.net> loet@leydesdorff.net;
<http://www.leydesdorff.net/> http://www.leydesdorff.net
-----Original Message-----
From: fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es]
On Behalf Of Michel Petitjean
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:15 AM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] FIS / introductory text / 5 April 2004
2004 FIS session introductory text.
Dear FISers,
I would like to thank Pedro Marijuan for his kind invitation
to chair the 2004 FIS session. The session is focussed on "Entropy and
Information". It is vast, that I am afraid to be able only to evoke some
general aspects, discarding specific technical developments.
Entropy and Information: two polymorphic concepts.
Although these two concepts are undoubtly related, they have different
stories.
Let us consider first the Information concept.
There was many discussions in the FIS list about the meaning
of Information. Clearly, there are several definitions.
The information concept that most people have in mind is outside the
scope of this text: is it born with Computer Sciences, or is it born
with Press, or does it exist since a so long time that nobody could date
it? Neglecting the definitions from the dictionnaries (for each language
and culture), I would say that anybody has his own concept. Philosophers
and historians have to look. The content of the FIS archives suggests
that the field is vast.
Now let us look to scientific definitions. Those arising from
mathematics are rigorous, but have different meanings. An example is the
information concept emerging from information theory (Hartley, Wiener,
Shannon, Renyi,...). This concept, which arises from probability theory,
has little connections with the Fisher information, which arises also
from probability theory. The same word is used, but two rigorous
concepts are defined. One is mostly related to coding theory, and the
other is related to estimation theory. One deals mainly with non
numerical finite discrete distributions, and the other is based on
statistics from samples of parametrized family of distributions. Even
within the framework of information theory, there are several
definitions of information (e.g. see the last chapter of Renyi's book on
Probability Theory). This situation arises often in mathematics: e.g.,
there are several concepts of "distance", and, despite the basic axioms
they all satisfy, nobody would say that they have the same meaning, even
when they are defined on a common space.
Then, mathematical tools are potential (and sometimes demonstrated)
simplified models for physical phenomenons. On the other hand,
scientists may publish various definitions of information for physical
situations. It does not mean that any of these definitions should be
confused between themselves and confused with the mathematical ones. In
many papers, the authors insist on the analogies between their own
concepts and those previously published by other authors: this attitude
may convince the reviewers of the manuscript that the work has interest,
but contribute to the general confusion, particularly when the confusing
terms are recorded in the bibliographic databases. Searching in
databases with the keyword "information" would lead to a considerable
number of hits: nobody would try it without constraining the search with
other terms (did some of you tried?).
We consider now the Entropy concepts. The two main ones are the
informational entropy and the thermodynamical entropy. The first one has
non ambiguous relations with information (in the sense of information
theory), since both are defined within the framework of a common theory.
Let us look now to the thermodynamical entropy, which was defined by
Rudolf Clausius in 1865. It is a physical concept, usually introduced
from the Carnot Cycle. The existence of entropy is postulated, and it is
a state function of the system. Usual variables are temperature and
pressure. Entropy calculations are sometimes made discarding the
implicit assumptions done for an idealized Carnot Cycle. Here come
difficulties. E.g., the whole universe is sometimes considered as a
system for which the the entropy is assumed to have sense. Does the
equilibrium of such a system has sense? Does thermodynamical state
functions make sense here? And what about "the" temperature? These
latter variable, even when viewed as a function of coordinates and/or
time, has sense only for a restricted number of situations. These
difficulties appear for many other systems. At other scales, they may
appear for microscopic systems, and for macroscopic systems unrelated to
thermochemistry.
In fact, what is often implicitly postulated is that the thermodynamical
entropy theory could work outside thermodynamics.
Statistical mechanics creates a bridge between microscopic and
macroscopic models, as evidenced from the work of Boltzmann. These two
models are different. One is a mathematical model for an idealized
physical situation (punctual balls, elastic collisions, distribution of
states, etc..), and the other is a simplified physical model, working
upon a restricted number of conditions. The expression of the entropy,
calculated via statistical mechanics methods, is formally similar to the
informational entropy. This latter has appeared many decades after the
former. Thus, the pioneers of information theory (Shannon, von Neumann)
who retain the term "entropy", are undoubtly responsible of the
historical link between <<Entropy>> and <<Information>> (e.g. see
http://www.bartleby.com/64/C004/024.html).
Although "entropy" is a well known term in information theory, and used
coherently with the term "information" in this area, the situation is
different in science. I do not know what is "information" in
theermodynamics (does anybody know?). However, "chemical information" is
a well known area of chemistry, which covers many topics, including data
mining in chemical data bases. In fact, chemical information was
reognized as a major field when the ACS decided in 1975 to rename one of
its journals "Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences": it
was previously named the "Journal of Chemical Documentation". There are
little papers in this journal which are connected with entropy
(thermodunamical of informational). An example is the 1996 paper of
Shu-Kun Lin, relating entropy with similarity and symmetry. Similarity
is itself a major area in chemical information, but I consider that the
main area of chemical information is related to chemical databases, such
that the chemical information is represented by the nodes and edges
graph associated to a structural formula. Actually, mathematical tools
able to work on this kind of chemical information are lacking,
particulary for statistics (did anyone performed statistics on graphs?).
In 1999, the links between information sciences and entropy were again
recognized, when Shu-Kun lin created the open access journal "Entropy":
<<An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Entropy and
Information Studies>>. Although most pluridisciplinary journals are at
the intersection of two areas, Shu-Kun Lin is a pionneer in the field of
transdisciplinarity, permitting the publication in a single journal of
works related to entropy and/or information theory, originating from
mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, economy, and philosophy.
The concept of information exists in other sciences for which the term
entropy is used. Bioinformation is a major concept in bioinformatics,
for which I am not specialist. Thus I hope that Pedro Marijuan would
like to help us to understand what are the links between bioinformation
and entropy. Entropy and information are known from economists and
philosophers. I also hope they add their voice to those of scientists
and mathematicians, to enlight our discussions during the session.
Now I would like to draw some provocative conclusions. Analogies between
concepts or between formal expressions of quantities are useful for the
spirit, for the quality of the papers, and sometimes they are used by
modellers to demonstrate why their work merit funds (does anybody never
do that?). The number of new concepts in sciences (includes mathematics,
economy, humanities, and so on) is increasing, and new terms are picked
in our natural language: the task of the teachers becomes harder and
harder. Entropy and Information are like the "fourth dimension", one
century ago: they offer in common the ability to provide exciting topics
to discuss. Unfortunately, Entropy and Information are much more
difficult to handle.
Michel Petitjean Email: petitjean@itodys.jussieu.fr
Editor-in-Chief of Entropy entropy@mdpi.org
ITODYS (CNRS, UMR 7086) ptitjean@ccr.jussieu.fr
1 rue Guy de la Brosse Phone: +33 (0)1 44 27 48 57
75005 Paris, France. FAX : +33 (0)1 44 27 68 14
http://www.mdpi.net http://www.mdpi.org
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.freeware.html
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
[email protected] http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis
Received on Mon Apr 5 10:12:50 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 07 Mar 2005 - 10:24:46 CET