Here is the copy of Lauri's response to the previous email
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lauri Grohn" <lauri.grohn@kolumbus.fi>
To: "Pavel Luksha" <bowin@mail.ru>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] art and meaning
> At 23:02 15.2.2006, Pavel Luksha wrote:
>>Therefore, I would also diagree that art is a technology of ethics.
>>Ethical systems are not derived from art, they forerun artistic
>>expressions of ethics. They are shaped by deep beliefs and values,
that
>>resolve personal existential questions (the problem of death and the
>>meaning of life). This can only be done by some form of religion - or
>>something that substitutes religion for a non-religious man.
>
> When or if "arts are technologies of ethics", it doesn't mean
that
> ethical systems are "derived from art", but that arts are
making ethics
> visible or audible. Just like many technologies are based on quantum
> mechanics taking that science - > technology parallel.
>
> LG
>
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis
Received on Thu Feb 16 14:30:54 2006
