Observation:
It is incredibly improper to compare
a paradigm system which has as its functional
thesis, the modeling of regional systems
effectively isolated from interference and
influence - to a paradigm system in which
no dynamics are isolated from encounter and
influence.
And its further inappropriate, to deny
they have -no- operative commonalities,
even in the face of different constraints
definitions for each.
The laws of physics are by consequence
and without challenge, the SOURCE and
precursive fount of anything and everything
biological.
If this postulate is not valid, then we would
have to allow that our universe is one in which
alternative rules of performance can be and have
been 'inserted' randomly and capriciously
expressed, without connectable rational with
ANY previous patterns or uniformities of
performances and actions.
We would see random, pervasive, NON-SEQUITOR
events everywhere and all the time.
But we don't. We just don't. There are no
random absurdities in the universe. There
is pragmatic functional coordinated pervasive
ORDER. Variations, yes. Differential alternatives,
yes. Even strangenesses that haven't been cleverly
or adequately modeled yet, yes. But no un-connectable
Rules of Behavior that totally conflict with prior
performances themata or rules of action organization.
The laws of physics generate and enact the behaviors
of biology. The schemata is a Coherent, across all
possibilities of organization and behavior.
Jamie Rose
Ceptual Institute
Jamie Rose
Guy A Hoelzer wrote:
>
> Hi Karl,
>
> The answer is NO, but then this also applies to many other objects, such
as
> stars and tornadoes. All dissipative systems churn non-linearly, so I
guess you
> would argue that the laws of Newton generally don't apply to dissipative
systems
> as wholes. I wouldn't argue with that; however I refered to the laws of
> physics, rather than the laws of Newton, which I meant to include
> far-from-equilibrium thermodynamic systems, like "biologic
bodies".
>
> Regards,
>
> Guy Hoelzer
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: karl.javorszky@chello.at [mailto:karl.javorszky@chello.at]
> Sent: Fri 10/27/2006 1:47 AM
> To: Guy A Hoelzer; fis@listas.unizar.es
> Subject: [Fis] Laws of physics do NOT apply in biology
>
> Hi Guy A Hoelzer,
>
> the laws of Newton do not apply in biology. Or, have you ever seen a
biologic
> body that remains in an idle state or keeps its linear movement forward?
>
> Karl
>
> _______________________________________________
> fis mailing list
> fis@listas.unizar.es
> http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis
Received on Tue Oct 31 03:13:05 2006
