Re: Re: [Fis] Re: What is the definition of information ?Re: Re: [Fis] Re: What is the definition of information ?
From: <kj04@chello.at>
Date: Tue 30 Aug 2005 - 16:05:05 CEST
Information is the pointing out of one alternative among many. Therefore, there must be several
alternatives. The only way I can find something made up by man's phantasies in which something could
be otherwise is the descision whether one regards a set of object as a collection of individual
things (here, one recognises the DIFFERENCES) or one regards them as groups which share properties
(here, one recognises the SIMILARITIES).
Still: information is the pointing out of one alternative among several. (This implies that a) the
more alternatives, the more information; b) information is, like as anything really rational,
mappable into additions.) There is absolutely no need to romanticise about information. This makes a
sham extasy like playing peek-aboo with a child. If I pretend that Information iss such a heavy and
complicated matter, then I get very excited if I can hack it. If it is just the pointing out of a
summand among many summands of an addition, then it sizzles and a feeling of "so what"
comes along. Are we in science to have excited inner workings or are we there to work?
Hope you come down from romanticism. Dry and boring stuff does have some merits, too. (Mostly, the
merits are technical and therefore economical. It may be that we lose in the FIS chatroom the
excitement of discussing something mysterious but at the same time we may get along with the boring
and less-than-peppy task of understanding how Nature packages info (be it in the memory or in
genetics) and translates probablities into certainities (be it in physics or chemistry).
Karl
>
_______________________________________________
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 on Tue 30 Aug 2005 - 16:04:27 CEST