RE: [Fis] Biological LawsRE: [Fis] Biological Laws
From: Robert Ulanowicz <ulan@cbl.umces.edu>
Date: Thu 26 Oct 2006 - 22:27:04 CEST
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Richard Emery wrote:
> To Guy and Bob (Hi, Bob!):
Hiya Rich! Good to make contact again!
> Just off hand, I can think of three biological "laws" worth
Well taken. The imnportant qualifier to Elsasser's treatment is "in the same
> 1. Cope's Law�"Structurally ordained biases of speciation away from a
I think it pertains to the increase of "overhead" (dissipative overhead,
Of course, I could have included my principle of increasing ascendency as
I suspect the same might apply to the "laws" you cite. It's just that I'm
The best,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 on Thu 26 Oct 2006 - 22:27:46 CEST