Re: [Fis] QI questions

To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] QI questions

OK. Similar situations may occur for ordinary correlations.
E.g., assuming that we get a high correlation coefficient between two
series of observations (physical phenomenons A and B), it could mean:

(1) A acts on B or A is the cause of B
(2) B acts on A or B is the cause of A
(3) C (to be identified) acts or is the cause of both A and B.

These situations may be cumulated.

The situation (3) is sometimes neglected by scientists, and also
sometimes by dishonest people willing to "prove" something.

E.g. when the weather is fine (high temperatures), people drink
more in the bar, and the time needed to dry washed clothes is
reduced. But of course, I shall not tell to my wife that I have
to drink more in order to get the clothes dried faster.

Coming back to particles, a potential C will cause effects on particles
A and B when A and B exist, although A and B are not themselves interacting.

Michel Petitjean, Email: petitjean@itodys.jussieu.fr
ITODYS (CNRS, UMR 7086) ptitjean@ccr.jussieu.fr
1 rue Guy de la Brosse Phone: +33 (0)1 44 27 48 57
75005 Paris, France. FAX : +33 (0)1 44 27 68 14
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html

From: "Stanley N. Salthe" <ssalthe@binghamton.edu>
> > Philosophical:
>
> > Could we say that the entanglement of two particles reduces to the fact
> > that a measure done on the first particle indicates something on the
> > second particle just because they are interacting ?
>
> SS: Could we say, alternatively, that entanglement means that they are
> not particles at all in this state, but just potentials within an entity of
> larger scale than particles?
>
> STAN

_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
http://webmail.unizar.es/mailman/listinfo/fis
Received on Wed May 17 11:34:42 2006